Playing God

"My concern is that I know that there are risks. But we don't have access to the data, and the data haven't been captured rigorously enough so that we can accurately assess those risks — and therefore…we don't really have the information that we need to make a reasonable decision."
                                                       --  Dr. Robert Malone, Co-inventor of mRNA Gene Therapy

I will not be jabbed. I have never been afraid of flu shots, or shingles immunizations. I have had most of them at one time or another. So taking vaccines is not the issue.

Friends ask me, "Then why won't you protect yourself from the Covid19 virus?"

I have to pause a moment because they are conflating at least two different issues. Taking a vaccine is one thing. Injecting yourself with an untested, brand new technology, is entirely different from every other vaccine in our lifetime. Before I can "answer" their question, we have to have some mutual understanding of what we are discussing. 

The Center For Disease Control had to change the definition of "vaccine" to accommodate Big Pharma's public relations campaign for the Covid19 injections. The definition that was posted on the CDC website in 2015 was: 

"A preparation of a weakened or killed pathogen, such as a bacterium or virus, or of a portion of the pathogen's structure that upon administration to an individual stimulates antibody production or cellular immunity against the pathogen but is incapable of causing severe infection."

Here is the new version:

"A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose."

This is simply a sterilized generic definition. They no longer offer a clinical definition of "vaccine" because they wanted citizens to associate the recently developed messenger RNA therapy injections with traditional methods of inoculating people with antibody stimulants. They claim there are dozens of success stories for vaccines protecting people all over the world from diseases like malaria, measles, chickenpox and tuberculosis. And those are accurate. But that data in no way represents data from mRNA gene therapy histories. They fail to distinguish the fact that Covid19 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines use mRNA molecules to essentially "update" and reconfigure the human immune response system to recognize and be prepared to defeat the aggressive Covid19 coronavirus. They omit the fact that this new medical approach has little or no long term test data.

They also fail to reveal that mRNA gene therapy is forever, and irreversible. It is also going to be passed on to progeny. Children born to vaccinated mRNA recipients will have the DNA modifications built into their chemistry. We do not know what that means at this point, because this is new technology, never introduced into human beings.
 
 "Messenger RNA (mRNA) is a single-stranded RNA molecule that is complementary to one of the DNA strands of a gene. The mRNA is an RNA version of the gene that leaves the cell nucleus and moves to the cytoplasm where proteins are made. During protein synthesis, an organelle called a ribosome moves along the mRNA, reads its base sequence, and uses the genetic code to translate each three-base triplet, or codon, into its corresponding amino acid."           --   National Genome Human Research Institute

Now that we have established the fact that the product we are injecting into the arms of 300M people around the world is not equatable to any previous vaccine in history, we can start to make sense of why some people refuse to be involved in what must be described as an "experimental" social program. 

Is it important to do something about a virus that could potentially kill millions of people? Of course, but the next question must be, what are the alternatives to something rushed into production during a period of social panic? Are there any?

It is obvious that the Big Pharma conglomerates can't be trusted to answer that because they have a vested interest in selling their solution. If we acknowledge that, then we have to also question the trustworthiness of the FDA, which is in bed with the pharmaceutical industry. They are codependents invested in drug solutions for virtually every physical nemesis confronting mankind. I would argue that many of our human health challenges are directly connected to the fact that we Play God with our immune system chemistry, and though we are often successful, we are also often playing whack-a-mole, fixing one problem while creating a new one.

There is a ton of anecdotal evidence that Chinese and American scientists were experimenting with dangerous new viral compounds for years before the outbreak of Covid19. It is a known fact that the Covid19 molecule is a man-made concoction. There are numerous patents that have been issued to Bill Gates, to Moderna, Pfizer, and Anthony Fauci, to treat a variety of byproducts of the SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as many other side effects of the mRNA "vaccines". Which implies they knew there would be uncommon side effects long before the world knew Covid19 existed, and that they planned ahead to sell new products to treat the mutations, the variants and the side effects that they expected to occur.

The bottom line is that taking the jab is like getting caught in a spider web. The more you invest in the prescribed solution, the more you need the help of Big Pharma to continue to survive. Either way, you will be in their control, and everything you need For Your Own Good will be supplied by them. And it will cost you, directly or indirectly. 
​
What is becoming increasingly clear is that special interest transnational business conglomerates have suppressed any evidence of alternative treatments. They have a vested interest, to the tune of multi-billions of dollars, to funnel everybody into their most recent innovation. They have lobbied governments all over the world, and convinced them to spend taxpayer funds to provide "free" vaccinations. What a brilliant marketing strategy; Enlist the power of authority to force the population to use only their solution, and amortize the cost by representing the effort as a public health crisis with no other solution. JP Morgan and John D. Rockefeller would be envious of the monopoly Big Pharma has accomplished.

(Excerpted from my upcoming new book, F'd: For Your Own Good.)