One of the basic issues I address in my book, is the criminal fraud that has been perpetrated on American parents of college students. Politicians brag about increased participation and graduation rates, but they conveniently forget to mention that the kids are graduating college with an eighth grade education. Then those same kids are conscripted to become career government employees, given massive decision making powers affecting millions of people and billions of tax payer dollars, and guess what we get?

A bloated, arrogant and malevolent bureaucracy that expands and perpetuates itself by empowering unions and Democratic administrations. We get totally inept department heads who overspend wildly and still get horrible results. Then turn around and complain that if they had had bigger budgets, everything would be working just fine!

Skeptical? Think I am just a cranky Republican? Check this newly released study....

http://cnsnews.com/commentary/walter-e-williams/dumb-american-youth?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=CNS&utm_campaign=c-ww-dumb&utm_term=facebook&utm_content=c-ww-dumb

The Open and Shut Case Against Another Clinton White House
By the late Christopher Hitchens for Vanity Fair

"What would it take to ...make us wake up and inquire what on earth we are doing when we make the Clinton family drama--yet again—a central part of our own politics?

What do you have to forget or overlook in order to desire that this dysfunctional clan once more occupies the White House and is again in a position to rent the Lincoln Bedroom to campaign donors and to employ the Oval Office as a massage parlor?

You have to be able to forget, first, what happened to those who complained, or who told the truth, last time. It's often said, by people trying to show how grown-up and unshocked they are, that all Clinton did to get himself impeached was lie about sex. That's not really true. What he actually lied about, in the perjury that also got him disbarred, was the women.

And what this involved was a steady campaign of defamation, backed up by private dicks (you should excuse the expression) and salaried government employees, against women who I believe were telling the truth. In my opinion, Gennifer Flowers was telling the truth; so was Monica Lewinsky, and so was Kathleen Willey, and so, lest we forget, was Juanita Broaddrick, the woman who says she was raped by Bill Clinton. Yet one constantly reads that both Clintons, including the female who helped intensify the slanders against her mistreated sisters (Hillary), are excellent on women's "issues."

One also hears a great deal about how this awful joint tenure of the executive mansion was a good thing in that it conferred "experience" on the despised and much-deceived wife. Well, the main "experience" involved the comprehensive fouling-up of the nation's health-care arrangements, so as to make them considerably worse than they had been before and to create an opening for the worst-of-all-worlds option of the so-called HMO, combining as it did the maximum of capitalist gouging with the maximum of socialistic bureaucracy. This abysmal outcome, forgiven for no reason that I can perceive, was the individual responsibility of the woman who now seems to think it entitles her to the presidency.

But there was another "experience," this time a collaborative one, that is even more significant. During the Senate debate on the intervention in Iraq, Sen. Clinton made considerable use of her background and "experience" to argue that, yes, Saddam Hussein was indeed a threat. She did not argue so much from the position adopted by the Bush administration as she emphasized the stand taken, by both her husband and Al Gore, when they were in office, to the effect that another and final confrontation with the Baathist regime was more or less inevitable.

Now, it does not especially matter whether you agree or agreed with her about this (as I, for once, do and did). What does matter is that she has since altered her position and attempted, with her husband's help, to make people forget that she ever held it. And this, on a grave matter of national honor and security, merely to influence her short-term standing in the Iowa caucuses.

Surely that on its own should be sufficient to disqualify her from consideration?
Indifferent to truth, willing to use police-state tactics and vulgar libels against inconvenient witnesses, hopeless on health care, and flippant and fast and loose with national security: The case against Hillary Clinton for president is open-and-shut."

The above was written before the untimely and unfortunate death of Mr. Hitchens in 2011 and the contest for the election of 2012.  Before the recent events of Benghazi, the DNC emails and the revelations that Clinton has collaborated with her PACs on disruptions of her opponents rallies, her lies about her experiences in Iraq, and her obvious conflicts of interest accepting speech fees from donors and international governments that have business with the State Department and the White House, and that have horrendous human rights records, especially against homosexuals and women.

Hitchen's naked assessment is haunting.

​