'RIGGED' is defined as "something that is fixed in a dishonest way
to guarantee a desired outcome."
Some examples of how to rig an election (as provided by our good friends at the Democratic National Convention headquarters via Julian Assange):
So the major party in America that represents fairness and tolerance and a level playing field (according to them) has instead opted to use deceit and fear, and by collaborating with the most influential force in the world, the electronic media (see George Soros voting machine scandal), chosen to actively try to rig a national presidential election.
It is effectively a coordinated act of war on conservatism.
I heard Joy Behar, during a discussion on the progressive morning talk show "The View" when asked why liberals have no problem supporting proven slime balls that have abused women, politicians like Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson Jr, and Bill Clinton, but act repulsed by the male-chauvinistic jocktalk of Donald Trump. She said it was because as bad as their actions are, those liberals 'voted right!' They support the important social issues like abortion and minority rights, free college tuition and healthcare! They are soldiers marching in lockstep with Progressive Dogma.
For Progressives, it doesn't really matter about the candidate's character (unless they happen to be conservative), all that matters is how they vote. The ends justifies the means and the end is for liberal and progressive policies to control society. The integrity of the system is not as important as the results of the voting.
Just as the extremists who justify murder and terror as a holy act, extreme liberals justify character assassination, political corruption and the abandonment of morals as an act of Progressive Jihad.
One of the basic issues I address in my book, is the criminal fraud that has been perpetrated on American parents of college students. Politicians brag about increased participation and graduation rates, but they conveniently forget to mention that the kids are graduating college with an eighth grade education. Then those same kids are conscripted to become career government employees, given massive decision making powers affecting millions of people and billions of tax payer dollars, and guess what we get?
A bloated, arrogant and malevolent bureaucracy that expands and perpetuates itself by empowering unions and Democratic administrations. We get totally inept department heads who overspend wildly and still get horrible results. Then turn around and complain that if they had had bigger budgets, everything would be working just fine!
Skeptical? Think I am just a cranky Republican? Check this newly released study....
The Obamas invited some high profile rappers for an evening at the White House. Presumably they talked about wholesome ways to promote good values in their communities through their art.
The dignitaries included Rick Ross, Jay Z and Beyonce, and Nicki Minaj.
It must have been a thrilling night for the Obama girls, chatting with musicians whose rap reflects the trials and tribulations of young lovers and inner city blacks in today's challenging world.
Later, commenting on the crude language employed by Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, First Lady Michelle Obama said, "I can't stop thinking about this (Trumps chatter with Billy Bush about how easy it is to grope fawning women). It has shaken me to my core…What message are our little girls hearing about who they should look like, how they should act?"
That would be a really good question if it weren't so disingenuous.
She had no problem embracing the rappers whose lyrics glorify misogyny and
date rape...does anyone see the hypocrisy here? Besides the persistent overuse of the F and N word in their 'music', which is common language in the vernacular of rap, these folks are enamored with sexual subservience.
Nicki Minaj -"Yes I do the cooking/ Yes I do the cleaning/ Yes I keep the nana real sweet for your eating/ Yes you be the (boss) yes I be respecting."
Jay Z - "Slid the panties right to the side/ Ain`t got the time to take drawers off!"
Beyonce - "He popped all my buttons and he ripped my blouse/
He monica-lewinski'd all on my gown..."
Rick Ross - "Put molly all in her champagne/ She ain't even know it /
I took her home and I enjoyed that/ She ain't even know it."
Mrs.Obama, one thing is for sure; our White House virtue will never be the same.
The Open and Shut Case Against Another Clinton White House
By the late Christopher Hitchens for Vanity Fair
"What would it take to ...make us wake up and inquire what on earth we are doing when we make the Clinton family drama--yet again—a central part of our own politics?
What do you have to forget or overlook in order to desire that this dysfunctional clan once more occupies the White House and is again in a position to rent the Lincoln Bedroom to campaign donors and to employ the Oval Office as a massage parlor?
You have to be able to forget, first, what happened to those who complained, or who told the truth, last time. It's often said, by people trying to show how grown-up and unshocked they are, that all Clinton did to get himself impeached was lie about sex. That's not really true. What he actually lied about, in the perjury that also got him disbarred, was the women.
And what this involved was a steady campaign of defamation, backed up by private dicks (you should excuse the expression) and salaried government employees, against women who I believe were telling the truth. In my opinion, Gennifer Flowers was telling the truth; so was Monica Lewinsky, and so was Kathleen Willey, and so, lest we forget, was Juanita Broaddrick, the woman who says she was raped by Bill Clinton. Yet one constantly reads that both Clintons, including the female who helped intensify the slanders against her mistreated sisters (Hillary), are excellent on women's "issues."
One also hears a great deal about how this awful joint tenure of the executive mansion was a good thing in that it conferred "experience" on the despised and much-deceived wife. Well, the main "experience" involved the comprehensive fouling-up of the nation's health-care arrangements, so as to make them considerably worse than they had been before and to create an opening for the worst-of-all-worlds option of the so-called HMO, combining as it did the maximum of capitalist gouging with the maximum of socialistic bureaucracy. This abysmal outcome, forgiven for no reason that I can perceive, was the individual responsibility of the woman who now seems to think it entitles her to the presidency.
But there was another "experience," this time a collaborative one, that is even more significant. During the Senate debate on the intervention in Iraq, Sen. Clinton made considerable use of her background and "experience" to argue that, yes, Saddam Hussein was indeed a threat. She did not argue so much from the position adopted by the Bush administration as she emphasized the stand taken, by both her husband and Al Gore, when they were in office, to the effect that another and final confrontation with the Baathist regime was more or less inevitable.
Now, it does not especially matter whether you agree or agreed with her about this (as I, for once, do and did). What does matter is that she has since altered her position and attempted, with her husband's help, to make people forget that she ever held it. And this, on a grave matter of national honor and security, merely to influence her short-term standing in the Iowa caucuses.
Surely that on its own should be sufficient to disqualify her from consideration?
Indifferent to truth, willing to use police-state tactics and vulgar libels against inconvenient witnesses, hopeless on health care, and flippant and fast and loose with national security: The case against Hillary Clinton for president is open-and-shut."
The above was written before the untimely and unfortunate death of Mr. Hitchens in 2011 and the contest for the election of 2012. Before the recent events of Benghazi, the DNC emails and the revelations that Clinton has collaborated with her PACs on disruptions of her opponents rallies, her lies about her experiences in Iraq, and her obvious conflicts of interest accepting speech fees from donors and international governments that have business with the State Department and the White House, and that have horrendous human rights records, especially against homosexuals and women.
Hitchen's naked assessment is haunting.
Would Columbia let Maria Teresa Osorio de Serna run for President? The notorious drug lord, heir apparent to El Chapo, has plenty of money and influence. She is a woman. She knows how to run a large complex drug smuggling operation and has international ties. She certainly has a mind of her own.
So why not?
Like Hillary, maybe it is because she is untrustworthy. Or maybe it's because a lot of people who have done business with her have suddenly turned up dead. Or maybe because she has no idea of how to legitimately run a business or a country. It could be that she is a habitual criminal running a worldwide criminal enterprise, such as those that Don Hillary runs, otherwise known as the DNC and the Clinton Crime Family Foundation.
So when Donald Trump suggests that in the upcoming Presidential election, there are issues about it's legitimacy, he is right. Again.
The fact that a person with a criminal record like Don Hillary could even be on the ballot makes this whole election suspect. Just as many of the drug lords of the world have not actually been convicted yet doesn't make it OK for them to seek public office. Law enforcement knows who did what. In our legal system, our investigators know that Hillary has been implicated in dozens of suspicious cases of intimidation, of misrepresentation, of destruction of evidence, of lying to investigators, of misappropriating funds, of obstruction of justice, etc, etc,.
There was Whitewater, the missing notes from her real estate deals that later showed up in her possession, the White House Post Office contract, Vince Foster, the missing furniture from the White House, the intimidation of women who accused her husband of sexual improprieties, the deletion of supenied emails, the destruction of her cell phones, the conversations she cannot remember, and her outright lies about the cause of the Benghazi attacks and how she dismissed the death of an ambassador as something that resulted from some guys out looking for something to blow up.
The recent release of the videos of DNC collusion in disrupting peaceful and legitimate rally for Trump amounts to massive violations of election laws and interfering with the political process, of undermining freedom of expression and the right to gather in public or private areas to voice political views. The WikiLeaks emails show multimillion dollar pay-for-play donations and gifts to the foundation and for 30 minute speeches are obviously bribes under cover of charity contributions.
How else does the Clinton Crime Family amass hundreds of millions of personal fortune while on government salaries?
As the titular head of the Democratic election arm of the party she is accountable for the actions of those hired guns, or Hombres, as Trump called them. As First Lady she got away with stuff as a courtesy to the Office of President, but now it looks more like she has managed to 'persuade' the Democratically appointed leaders of the justice department. If it weren't for a compromised DOJ and FBI, Don Hillary would be waiting for a trial right now, not parading around slapping herself on the back and hacking in the face of justice and the American electorate.
It has to be clear to any interested observer that the 4th estate is no longer a news media. There are a few organizations that actually report the news, but overall, what used to be a revered and important part of a free society has been totally corrupted.
It is painful to see such a vital and transformative institution shredded by politically driven ideologues. There is absolutely no shame in their obvious propaganda to assure the reelection of another politician that is owned and coopted by multinational corporations pushing for a one-world, borderless and globalist government.
Remember the Clarence Thomas fiasco where he was accused of 'sexual harassment'? He called it a "high-tech lynching." Substitute the name Trump, and you have history repeating itself.
Since the civil war, Democrats have used any means necessary to DESTROY their philosophical opponents, and the history is undeniable. All of the charges are racial, sexual, or involve he-said she-said accusations that are virtually unprovable but leave deep scars of innuendo. And all attacks are aimed at conservatives. In the meantime, liberals give accolades to their political affiliates who are charged with similar violations of impropriety: Clinton, Weiner, Frank, Jackson Jr., Hart, Kennedy, Mel Reynolds and others were given kid glove treatment, where the press rationalized their indiscretions as 'personal matters'.
This is so antithetical to every tenant of the constitution of the United States, yet using the power of academia to inculcate our youth in Marxist ideology, who then move up into the halls of justice, of journalism and of government, and by memorializing their leftist agenda via media manipulation of the news and the language of reporting, we are witnessing the actualization of what George Orwell predicted in his precedent book '1984'.
Watch any network present a report on our nations election, and what you get is 'newspeak'. The dismemberment of the language of truth telling smells rancid because we are witnessing the Death of Journalism.
America has been suffering chest pains for over a year now. It has gotten so bad, the doctors have scheduled an operation for November 8th. The patient is limping along hoping to make it that long, keeping a defibrillator nearby just in case.
The doctors point to high anxiety, social unrest, inexplicable mass murder, rampant homelessness, joblessness and poverty, drug dependency, gender conflict, and a world awash in chaos, among other symptoms. Dr. Frankenstein thinks that the patient, this giant assemblage of parts and pieces of disparate races and creeds, is approaching a debilitating stroke or even death and must undergo invasive surgery as soon as possible.
Can America survive this operation? Will America ever be the same after this contentious, divisive and destructive election campaign?
It seems like some of the slanderous claims and counterclaims have left scars too deep to heal. The metastasizing disease has been so insidious and detrimental that many other organs are suffering, unable to perform their duties.
Our schools, our military operations, our veterans, law enforcement and health services are being compromised. The news media, even our entertainment organs are morphing into propaganda machines, so people don't know who to trust anymore.
Our populace, if you listen to the candidates, is made up of racists, bigoted homophobes, angry old white men clinging to bibles and guns, and are xenophobic fear mongers, religious zealots and degenerate welfare bandits, corrupt political hacks, sociopathic lone wolves and meat eating animal haters.
And we are all going to the polls in November to see who should be in charge of who. It sounds like a movie screenplay by Tim Burton or Mel Brooks, but it is the process of sorting out what direction the most powerful force on the face of the earth will go, so the angry villagers around the world will know that the giant lives and everything is going to be OK.
When election day comes, many of us will be spending it in bar, trying to anesthetize away our pain. And when the inauguration day comes next January, if the patient survives, the results of Dr. Frankenstein's work will take the oath of office.
I have a prediction, the next President of the United States will be Abby Normal.
During the next debate, Trump can sit on the fastball, make Hillary throw a strike, then hit it out of the park. Here's a preview....
Clinton: Mr. Trump, you avoided paying your fair share of taxes and therefore don't support government funded military needs, infrastructure, schools and social services.
Trump: Are you suggesting that any American that plays by the rules of the IRS and takes a legal tax deduction is not a patriot? Is that what you are saying? Be careful, because that attitude insults even more Americans than those you have already characterized as 'deplorable.'
I would argue that any citizen who doesn't take advantage of the rules about paying your taxes is not someone who could handle the demands of running the largest business in the world, the United States of America.
Clinton: Mr. Trump doesn't have the temperament to have his finger on the trigger of our nuclear instruments of mass destruction.
Trump: In our history, the Democrats have made that same argument about every Republican candidate. Whether it was George Bush, Ronald Reagan, Barry Goldwater or Richard Nixon. With Bush, Reagan, and Nixon we discovered that that claim was untrue. In fact, right after 911, polls showed that over 90% of Americans felt President Bush had handled the attack with calm assurance and strong leadership.
Now Democrats, trying to rewrite history, use terms like 'Cowboy' to disparage former President Bush. I would argue that during Bush's two terms, after 911, we suffered zero attacks on our homeland. Under the current Democratic regime, and much of that under the poor leadership of Mrs. Clinton and her heir apparent Secretary of State John Kerry's foreign policy, there have been no less than one attack per month!
Clinton: How can a man who disparages women, who calls Mexicans rapists, and who praises the leadership abilities of Vladimir Putin be put in charge of the world's most powerful nation? Any one who can't tell the difference between dictatorship and leadership should never become our president.
Trump: A candidate who allows their supporters to misrepresent their opponent, to manipulate quotes and to mangle the facts is too weak of character to stand strong against the world's bullies. I would refer to the total capitulation on the Iran Nuclear Agreement that you supported. The Iranian regime bullied you and Secretary Kerry into submission, getting everything they wanted.
As for my temperament, I stand on the example of the character of my family, my business success and the thousands of my company's employees representing a broad range of gender, races and religions that I have supported for nearly fifty years. They know who I am, and you don't see any of them lining up to denounce me.
I have been a public figure my whole life. I have worked with Republicans and Democrats, with blacks and hispanics, with Muslims and Jews for decades. Nobody characterized me as a racist or bigot until I became the leader of a movement that threatens to disrupt the bureaucratic aristocracy of the Washington establishment.
Clinton: You have no solutions. All you do is state platitudes about being 'Great Again' and 'Winning.' But there is no 'there' there. How can people trust you to actually do what you say you will do?
Trump: I set the bar very high. I don't say I will make America good again. I say 'Great Again'. I will put the right people in the right positions to excel. I will put our citizens, our American brothers and sisters, and our nation's interests first.
When I go into a negotiation to acquire the rights to build a new project, I don't tell my competition all the specifics of just how we will meet the challenge. I believe America's leaders need to do a better job of protecting our assets, our strategies and how we intend to accomplish our goals.
In the political world talk is cheap. In the business world performance is all that matters. In my world, results are the measurement of success. I have a strong record of exceeding expectations, of adding great value, and building long term coalitions throughout the world. I will lead by example, I will build coalitions, and we will do a much better job of protecting our nation's assets and values.
Mrs. Clinton has, on the other hand, had zero experience in hiring people, other than lawyers of course. She has never had to submit a balance sheet, or to manage the construction of incredibly complex buildings in foreign countries, where the rules and regulations and the challenges of dealing with conflicting cultures can quickly shut you down. She has no history of coming in under budget, because all she has ever done is spend taxpayers money. Her effort to redesign our healthcare system was a total disaster.
So when I hear her surrogates say she is the most prepared person to ever run for President, I am insulted. I am offended by the dismissal of the track records of hundreds of former candidates of both parties.
But enough of that. My point is that unless you have been living under a rock for the past fifty years, it is obvious that I am imminently qualified to run the biggest and most complex business in the world, the United States of America. And I promise you, I will make America Great Again!
In my book I note how critical it is that our schools instill a sense of pride and patriotism in our American children. Unfortunately, many younger parents, being by- products of the subordination of our public schools to radical leftists over the past 30 years, hold hostile views of Americanism. As they hold teaching and administrative positions in the union captive school systems, pressure has been brought to bear to forsake anything that smacks of nationalism, and now we have to allow students to 'opt out' of pledging their allegiance to the country that gives them the freedom and rights to be so selfish.
This is not just avoiding the phrase 'under God,' this is ignoring the concept of 'allegiance.'
From the Pledge of Allegiance, to the National Anthem, atheists, socialists and globalists want to remove all elements of patriotism from our elementary and middle schools.
This is why we have a movement of narcissists like Colin Kaepernick choosing to turn the spotlight on themselves so they can make headlines to elevate their personal unhappiness with societal shortcomings.
Wake up friends! This is not paranoia, it is an assault on our culture and our way of life, and those who would transform our egalitarian nation into a socialist state of lowest common denominator PC zombies, are using our children as leverage in their dirty war to sabotage Americanism.