The Progressive Jihad

'RIGGED' is defined as "something that is fixed in a dishonest way
to guarantee a desired outcome."

Some examples of how to rig an election (as provided by our good friends at the Democratic National Convention headquarters via Julian Assange):

• Stack the deck of news media outlets so they provide 20 times more negative coverage of one candidate over the other.

• Pit the combined forces of the political machinery of one party with the vast digital influence of 90% of the media, and flood the daily news cycle with a rosy picture of a landslide victory for your candidate.

• Disrupt the opposing parties meetings and public rallies with coordinated professional actors to provoke violence, then have the compliant media blame the opposing candidate for inciting violence and divisiveness.

• Purposely misquote, re-edit or take out of proper context, verbalizations of the opposing candidate, then set up high profile media discussions about those false scenarios and quotes.
  
  
  
• Provide insider information to one candidate and not the other and in their TV debates, and with complicit hosts, lead the discussion in the direction that best represents your candidates polished image.

• Flood the news cycle with false data such as paid polls, small favorable sample polls, distorted historical data, and planted testimonials from paid actors and sympathetic high profile celebrities.

• Use intimidation via major agencies and departments such as the IRS, State Department and DOJ, social media communications services like Facebook and Twitter, commerce, trade, and Immigration services to silence opposition voices and digital messaging.

• Encourage voting by illegals, institutionalized and dead people, and use volunteers to misplace absentee ballots.

• Use emotionally charged issues and news sound bites to keep the public focused on tawdry and venal headlines of unsupported but 'disturbing' claims while ignoring the malfeasance of the favorable candidate.

• Trot out an endless number of social activists and community organizers that suggest that electing the other guy would undo hundreds of years of peaceful democratic elections history and possibly lead to the total collapse of the constitutional way of government in America.

So the major party in America that represents fairness and tolerance and a level playing field (according to them) has instead opted to use deceit and fear, and by collaborating with the most influential force in the world, the electronic media (see George Soros voting machine scandal), chosen to actively try to rig a national presidential election.

​It is effectively a coordinated act of war on conservatism.

I heard Joy Behar, during a discussion on the progressive morning talk show "The View" when asked why liberals have no problem supporting proven slime balls that have abused women, politicians like Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson Jr, and Bill Clinton, but act repulsed by the male-chauvinistic jocktalk of Donald Trump. She said it was because as bad as their actions are, those liberals 'voted right!' They support the important social issues like abortion and minority rights, free college tuition and healthcare! They are soldiers marching in lockstep with Progressive Dogma.

For Progressives, it doesn't really matter about the candidate's character (unless they happen to be conservative), all that matters is how they vote. The ends justifies the means and the end is for liberal and progressive policies to control society. The integrity of the system is not as important as the results of the voting.


Just as the extremists who justify murder and terror as a holy act, extreme liberals justify character assassination, political corruption and the abandonment of morals as an act of Progressive Jihad.