"...the inoculation of people with an experimental genic serum that provokes a weakening of our natural immune system represents a very grave crime, because it turns ordinary healthy people into chronically ill people, and consequently into customers of the health care companies and private care. This situation hugely inflates the profits of the globalist élite and brings a general impoverishment of the population. Even this aspect, apparently secondary, reveals the subversive character of the “Great Reset,” because the “Great Reset” does not represent only an attack against the health of an individual, but also an attack against the national security of the States, because their armed forces are harmed by the side effects of the vaccine, while the not-vaccinated soldiers are banned from active duty. I think that this is a point not enough considered by those who are analyzing the present crisis, and it shows the malice of those who. Once in power, cooperate for the destruction of nations in order to subjugate them to the New Order." -- https://www.theyeoftheneedle.com/2021/12/03/viganothose-who-resist-the-nwo-will-have-the-help-and-protection-of-god/
It was like any other morning, bright and sunny. The air was clean and crisp, when suddenly all Hell broke loose. Imperial Japan conducted a sneak attack on America.
That was eighty years ago on December 7th, 1941. It became known as "A Date Which Will Live In Infamy" as President Roosevelt noted in his famous Pearl Harbor speech demanding Congress declare war on Japan.
At that point in time, America was divided about joining the growing war in Europe. Pearl Harbor changed the mood of Americans dramatically. We suddenly realized we could no longer expect the Pacific and Atlantic oceans to protect us from evil.
We wanted to believe World War I was "the war to end all wars". We wanted to believe Hitler was just a regional political anomaly, and that the British and French were well equipped to handle the belligerents in Russia, Germany and Italy. We wanted to believe the Japanese would leave us alone.
But after the debacle at Dunkirk and the surrender of France, Americans were slowly realizing the need to intervene was rapidly approaching. Pearl Harbor was a full-on declaration of war which awakened the sleepy soul of Americanism. It was the realization that we could not continue to let megalomaniacs determine the future of the planet.
Pearl Harbor was the Great Awakening.
Young freedom-loving Americans beat a path to the closest recruitment office. They acted on their instincts that if they didn't, the concept of Americanism, the unique umbrella of freedom and opportunity that our Constitutional Republic guarantees, would be destroyed by power hungry authoritarians.
As we approach the 80th anniversary of remembering Pearl Harbor, I can't help but wonder, what would Americans have done if, instead of a traditional military assault, the Japanese, in collusion with the Nazis, had crippled us with a coordinated, asymmetrical series of internal tactical attacks on every form of resistance available to our leadership? If instead of dropping bombs on our warships, our enemies had sabotaged our energy grid, destroyed our means of communication, spoiled our water and food supplies and plunged America into darkness and confusion?
What if, on December 7th 1941, our country had been attacked by an unknown force, and our ability to understand who and what was attacking us was indiscernible? Would our citizens have reacted with as much passion and determination had they not understood who was our enemy?
As we have learned in recent years, war is no longer just about military hardware killing people and breaking things. Eight decades after Pearl Harbor, our responsibility as freedom loving Americans, is to recognize assaults on our American sovereignty, no matter what form they might take.
I worry that the next attack on Americanism may, in fact, have already happened. And because it was unlike any we have ever witnessed, it went unrecognized. That a coordinated tactical assault on Americanism has been quietly undermining our unity, our economy, our willingness to respond, and like rust destroys metal, it is progressively eating away at our precious national community.
Unlike bloody battles in military warfare, psychological and cyber warfare can be nearly invisible and still have devastating consequences. Since our generation has never been confronted with anything like it, maybe we should be extra sensitive to the destructive potential of its reality.
If you look at the restlessness of demonstrators in major cities around the world, it is undeniable that people are suffering from a sense of fear and intimidation. Something is happening and though we can't put our finger on it, it feels like authoritarianism is sneaking up on freedom.
"My concern is that I know that there are risks. But we don't have access to the data, and the data haven't been captured rigorously enough so that we can accurately assess those risks — and therefore…we don't really have the information that we need to make a reasonable decision."
-- Dr. Robert Malone, Co-inventor of mRNA Gene Therapy
I will not be jabbed. I have never been afraid of flu shots, or shingles immunizations. I have had most of them at one time or another. So taking vaccines is not the issue.
Friends ask me, "Then why won't you protect yourself from the Covid19 virus?"
I have to pause a moment because they are conflating at least two different issues. Taking a vaccine is one thing. Injecting yourself with an untested, brand new technology, is entirely different from every other vaccine in our lifetime. Before I can "answer" their question, we have to have some mutual understanding of what we are discussing.
The Center For Disease Control had to change the definition of "vaccine" to accommodate Big Pharma's public relations campaign for the Covid19 injections. The definition that was posted on the CDC website in 2015 was:
"A preparation of a weakened or killed pathogen, such as a bacterium or virus, or of a portion of the pathogen's structure that upon administration to an individual stimulates antibody production or cellular immunity against the pathogen but is incapable of causing severe infection."
Here is the new version:
"A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose."
This is simply a sterilized generic definition. They no longer offer a clinical definition of "vaccine" because they wanted citizens to associate the recently developed messenger RNA therapy injections with traditional methods of inoculating people with antibody stimulants. They claim there are dozens of success stories for vaccines protecting people all over the world from diseases like malaria, measles, chickenpox and tuberculosis. And those are accurate. But that data in no way represents data from mRNA gene therapy histories. They fail to distinguish the fact that Covid19 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines use mRNA molecules to essentially "update" and reconfigure the human immune response system to recognize and be prepared to defeat the aggressive Covid19 coronavirus. They omit the fact that this new medical approach has little or no long term test data.
They also fail to reveal that mRNA gene therapy is forever, and irreversible. It is also going to be passed on to progeny. Children born to vaccinated mRNA recipients will have the DNA modifications built into their chemistry. We do not know what that means at this point, because this is new technology, never introduced into human beings.
"Messenger RNA (mRNA) is a single-stranded RNA molecule that is complementary to one of the DNA strands of a gene. The mRNA is an RNA version of the gene that leaves the cell nucleus and moves to the cytoplasm where proteins are made. During protein synthesis, an organelle called a ribosome moves along the mRNA, reads its base sequence, and uses the genetic code to translate each three-base triplet, or codon, into its corresponding amino acid." -- National Genome Human Research Institute
Now that we have established the fact that the product we are injecting into the arms of 300M people around the world is not equatable to any previous vaccine in history, we can start to make sense of why some people refuse to be involved in what must be described as an "experimental" social program.
Is it important to do something about a virus that could potentially kill millions of people? Of course, but the next question must be, what are the alternatives to something rushed into production during a period of social panic? Are there any?
It is obvious that the Big Pharma conglomerates can't be trusted to answer that because they have a vested interest in selling their solution. If we acknowledge that, then we have to also question the trustworthiness of the FDA, which is in bed with the pharmaceutical industry. They are codependents invested in drug solutions for virtually every physical nemesis confronting mankind. I would argue that many of our human health challenges are directly connected to the fact that we Play God with our immune system chemistry, and though we are often successful, we are also often playing whack-a-mole, fixing one problem while creating a new one.
There is a ton of anecdotal evidence that Chinese and American scientists were experimenting with dangerous new viral compounds for years before the outbreak of Covid19. It is a known fact that the Covid19 molecule is a man-made concoction. There are numerous patents that have been issued to Bill Gates, to Moderna, Pfizer, and Anthony Fauci, to treat a variety of byproducts of the SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as many other side effects of the mRNA "vaccines". Which implies they knew there would be uncommon side effects long before the world knew Covid19 existed, and that they planned ahead to sell new products to treat the mutations, the variants and the side effects that they expected to occur.
The bottom line is that taking the jab is like getting caught in a spider web. The more you invest in the prescribed solution, the more you need the help of Big Pharma to continue to survive. Either way, you will be in their control, and everything you need For Your Own Good will be supplied by them. And it will cost you, directly or indirectly.
What is becoming increasingly clear is that special interest transnational business conglomerates have suppressed any evidence of alternative treatments. They have a vested interest, to the tune of multi-billions of dollars, to funnel everybody into their most recent innovation. They have lobbied governments all over the world, and convinced them to spend taxpayer funds to provide "free" vaccinations. What a brilliant marketing strategy; Enlist the power of authority to force the population to use only their solution, and amortize the cost by representing the effort as a public health crisis with no other solution. JP Morgan and John D. Rockefeller would be envious of the monopoly Big Pharma has accomplished.
(Excerpted from my upcoming new book, F'd: For Your Own Good.)
The San Diego Padres have imploded, and I blame the GM and the Head Coach. If you look at their record, the Padres were an exciting, competitive team up until the moment they traded for Adam Frazier. The players had to be thinking, why did we go get an all-star second basemen when we have Ha Seong-Kim and Jake Cronenworth, possibly the team's MVP? What we need is a strong, dominating starting pitcher!
When Fernando Tatis got hurt, they panicked, and Jayce Tingler started messing with the line up and the batting order. Ever since, the team has lost its momentum, identity and intensity.
They have added Jake Arrieta, Reiss Knehr, Daniel Hudson, Nabil Krismatt, and Jake Marisnick. Nothing too exceptional or impactful. You have to ask yourself, is this all they got? I feel bad for the guys that are sharing starting roles: Will Meyers, Eric Hosmer, Victor Caratini and Adam Nola. They are being shuffled around and never know when they're going to start or where in the order they are going to hit.
Jayce, don't mess with the batting order!
Tommy Pham was rapidly becoming one of the MLB's best leadoff hitters, and settling in for the first time in his career. But when Tatis went down, Tingler moved Cronenworth to short, put Pham on the bench, and started playing musical chairs at the leadoff spot. Boom, the team imploded. Everybody is playing out of place, the batting order makes no sense, and all of the players' batting averages have crashed.
The starting pitchers are never properly prepared to start games. We look like a minor league team that just got off the bus. If we can survive a first inning tsunami, we might be able to rally and salvage a win. But teams that have to rely on the bullpen to bail out starters that can't complete 5 or 6 innings are never going to finish the season strong. The pitching staff is a train wreck.
Now, with mounting injuries, the first-half team is gone. It was looking like a lock to make the playoffs. Everybody was contributing, the offense was multifaceted and the bullpen was consistent. Mark Malancon was racking up saves. Suddenly the running game and the power game have disappeared. The second-half team is playing like the Washington Generals against the Harlem Globetrotters.
GM A.J. Preller has, once again, put the team in a position to lose with wishful trades and acquisitions that simply don't make any sense. Tingler is playing fast and loose with the batting order and the makeshift lineup is putting the whole team under unnecessary pressure.
When my son was playing travel ball, his team was getting routinely shellacked. The coaches would lecture them, shout at them, single out players for slacking off, and then change the line up every day, hoping to find the magic formula. The last game of the season, the manager gathered the team together just before the game, and said, "Alright! You guys think you're so smart, tonight you are going to manage the game yourselves! We (the coaches) will be sitting on the bench watching! Good luck, I hope you can figure it out!"
The team went out and won 25-0….
DADT should be the official United States position on military service by any US citizen. The policy should prohibit military personnel from discriminating against or harassing suspected unvaccinated service members or applicants, from military service.
A proposed new policy would prohibit people who refuse to participate in an unproven medical experiment from serving in the armed forces of the United States, based on the idea that their presence "would create an unacceptable risk to the cohesion that is the essence of military capability". Recent data indicates that the role of vaccinated/unvaccinated people play in the spread of the COVID19 or other variants is statistically indistinguishable.
Therefore, discriminating against unvaccinated citizens is wrong on two principles:
The United States should pass an act prohibiting service members from disclosing their vaccination status or from speaking about any personal medical decisions made between themselves and their doctors while serving in the United States armed forces. The act should specify that service members who disclose their own personal medical information, or that of other service members, should be discharged.
The "don't ask" part of the DADT policy would specify that superiors must not initiate investigations of a service member's vaccination status without third party evidence of viral infection such as a PCR positive test result. Even then, all inquiries must be made only by qualified military medical personnel and results must be closely held. Unauthorized investigations and harassment of suspected unvaccinated servicemen and women would qualify as a criminal invasion of privacy and lead to an investigation and/or legal proceedings against those involved.